Danger Zone vs trump

 

Singer-songwriter Kenny Loggins is asking President Trump to remove the audio of one of his performances from a contentious AI-generated video that Trump posted on his Truth Social account on Saturday evening.

In the fake video, a crown-wearing Trump is in a fighter jet emblazoned "KING TRUMP." Accompanied by Loggins singing "Danger Zone" — a hit single from the 1986 movie Top Gun — the plane dumps sludgy brown material over crowds of protesters carrying American flags and signs in what appears to be New York City's Times Square.

The video was published as an apparent reply to the widespread No Kings protests that took place across the U.S. on Saturday. (On Saturday evening, the official White House account posted a fake image on X of Trump and Vice President Vance wearing crowns, juxtaposed with a fake image of Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., and Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., in sombreros.)

In a statement sent to NPR on Monday morning, Loggins wrote: "This is an unauthorized use of my performance of 'Danger Zone.' Nobody asked me for my permission, which I would have denied, and I request that my recording on this video is removed immediately." ("Danger Zone" was written by Top Gun's score composer, Giorgio Moroder, and songwriter Tom Whitlock, with Loggins as the performer.)

Loggins continued: "I can't imagine why anybody would want their music used or associated with something created with the sole purpose of dividing us. Too many people are trying to tear us apart, and we need to find new ways to come together. We're all Americans, and we're all patriotic. There is no 'us and hem' – that's not who we are, nor is it what we should be. It's all of us. We're in this together, and it is my hope that we can embrace music as a way of celebrating and uniting each and every one of us."

There is a long history of musicians objecting to the current president (among other political leaders) using their work to send political messages. However, such use is generally legal, as long as rights holders are paid correctly; the only use that performers and songwriters can specifically prohibit is the use of songs in campaign advertisements. Even so, many artists choose to make such objections public so that a general audience is aware of their stance.

NPR reached out to the White House for a response to Loggins' specific objections and his request that his performance be removed.

In reply, White House spokesperson Davis R. Ingle did not respond to NPR's questions but sent NPR an image from the film Top Gun of stars Tom Cruise and the late Val Kilmer, captioned: "I FEEL THE NEED FOR SPEED."

Various musicians and their representatives, including The White Stripes and the estate of Isaac Hayes, have filed civil suits against Trump alleging copyright infringement. The White Stripes dropped their suit in November 2024. The Hayes suit, which was filed against the president, his reelection campaign and the activist group Turning Point Action, is continuing to wend its way through federal court in Atlanta.

SOURCE: https://www.npr.org/2025/10/20/nx-s1-5580328/kenny-loggins-donald-trump-ai-video

The SCOTUS Women

Women of the Supreme Court just did what far too many elected officials have failed to do: they stood up to Trump’s MAGA regime and called bullshit directly, publicly, and with precision.

Amy Coney Barrett, yes, that Amy Coney Barrett, Trump’s handpicked ideologue looked Trump’s lawyer in the eyes and essentially asked, “Are you really suggesting the president can ignore court rulings he doesn’t like?” 

That’s what this case boils down to,

a wannabe king trying to erase birthright citizenship, and daring the courts to stop him.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson didn’t just challenge the logic, she torched it. 

She warned that Trump’s legal argument would transform the entire justice system into a “catch me if you can” farce. 

No rights. No protections. Just every person for themselves, suing the government individually while it tramples them one by one.

Elena Kagan drove it home with cold clarity: “Every court is ruling against you.” Translation? 

This isn’t a legal debate. This is a last-ditch power grab dressed up in bad lawyering.

Then came Justice Sotomayor, wielding the Second Amendment like a rhetorical sledgehammer. She asked the nightmare question: "What if a president decided to seize everyone’s guns, would courts have to wait while rights were trampled coast to coast?" 

Her point was clear: If the executive can ignore the judiciary, then we don’t have a Constitution anymore. We have a monarch.

This wasn’t just about immigration. This was about whether a president can bulldoze the law and dare the courts to clean up the wreckage. It was about whether the rule of law is still alive in America.

And the fact that women, conservative, liberal, and everything in between, were the loudest voices defending the Constitution!

~Brent Molnar

https://www.facebook.com/p/Brent-Molnar-Voice-of-Reason-61571720674789/?_rdr