Women of the Supreme Court just did what far too many elected officials have failed to do: they stood up to Trump’s MAGA regime and called bullshit directly, publicly, and with precision.
Amy Coney Barrett, yes, that Amy Coney Barrett, Trump’s handpicked ideologue looked Trump’s lawyer in the eyes and essentially asked, “Are you really suggesting the president can ignore court rulings he doesn’t like?”
That’s what this case boils down to,
a wannabe king trying to erase birthright citizenship, and daring the courts to stop him.
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson didn’t just challenge the logic, she torched it.
She warned that Trump’s legal argument would transform the entire justice system into a “catch me if you can” farce.
No rights. No protections. Just every person for themselves, suing the government individually while it tramples them one by one.
Elena Kagan drove it home with cold clarity: “Every court is ruling against you.” Translation?
This isn’t a legal debate. This is a last-ditch power grab dressed up in bad lawyering.
Then came Justice Sotomayor, wielding the Second Amendment like a rhetorical sledgehammer. She asked the nightmare question: "What if a president decided to seize everyone’s guns, would courts have to wait while rights were trampled coast to coast?"
Her point was clear: If the executive can ignore the judiciary, then we don’t have a Constitution anymore. We have a monarch.
This wasn’t just about immigration. This was about whether a president can bulldoze the law and dare the courts to clean up the wreckage. It was about whether the rule of law is still alive in America.
And the fact that women, conservative, liberal, and everything in between, were the loudest voices defending the Constitution!
~Brent Molnar
https://www.facebook.com/p/Brent-Molnar-Voice-of-Reason-61571720674789/?_rdr
